Showing posts with label hitwise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hitwise. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Would Google buy Experian?

Google's next acquisition will make the headlines. Google always does. Being the geek that I am - it's sometimes fun to mull over which will be the next big name that Google might buy. Will it be Iron Mountain? What about Experian?

Experian is a huge company and the market leader in the United Kingdom. Experian keeps track of individual's credit records. If I want to buy a house or get a credit card then the bank will check with Experian to find out whether I'm known to be bad at paying bills or whether I've a good record of paying on time.

Experian, therefore, holds a lot of information. Google tends to be hungry for information. Is it the type of information that Google wants? Well. That's a trickier one. It's certainly not the type of information that Google normally goes for but then we have Google Health which proves the exception to the rule. Google Health does touch on aggregating some of this "flavour" of data.

I think there would be more drama and concerns about privacy if Google did buy Experian. In theory, Google could begin to investigate ways in which to target high value AdWords to people who have a history of splashing the cash. I think that, though, would be too much for many Googlers to stomach.

There is another angle.

Experian owns Hitwise.

Now Hitwise and its data certainly would seem to be the type of company Google would be interested in buying. This begs the question; why didn't Google buy Hitwise?

If you've been lucky enough to attend a presentation by one of Google's vertical account managers then you'll have noticed just how often they can lean on Hitwise data. It may be that Google didn't know that Hitwise was for sale. It may also have been the case that Hitwise simply didn't approach Google. I'm reminded of the comment Seregy recently gave to the press about Facebook.

We don’t really look at companies for acquisitions unless they are really interested.

It may also be the case that Google does not need Hitwise's data. They may have it all anyway. They just don't share it. They certainly don't brand it up and allow Googlers to present with it - not even to huge international brands. In this case it may even be quite handy to have the independent Hitwise source of some data. Google therefore avoids the situation were they are seen to giving some of their data to some clients and withholding it from others.

I'll stick my next out. "Will Google buy Experian?" I think it's a juicy question to mull over. It'll be interesting times if Google does buy the company. I don't think they will. I think Experian is too big, too expensive, too controversial and maybe even too old (even though it only recently detached itself from GUS). I think Google may get better value from Hitwise by keeping them out of Google's growing family of brands.

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Google

It's all Google; isn't it.

Google's just about noticed this new domain. The home page URL and the main blog index URL are in the index but the pages themselves have not been spidered.

Google Analytics
I was lucky enough to have a play with Google Analytics before it was released to the public. I thought at the time they had under-estimated how huge the impact would be. Google have just killed the cream in a previously cash rich industry. Who will pay for unsupported web analysis now?

Google Analytics' weakness is that it's entirely off the shelf and there's no support at all. If you're the type of webmaster or marketing manager who needs to have tracking set up "just so" then, even though it's free, Google Analytics may not be for you.

Google Analytics doesn't offer any bid management either. The system can take a peak at your AdWords costs and help calculate ROI but that's it.

Although the likes of Web Trends and Hitbox / WebSideStory are in big trouble, the 'Best of Breed' Coremetrics are fine and are bidding gurus like HitDynamics will be safe if they can push their product on.

Google Base
I like the idea of Google Base and I see its potential. The carrot being waved at us that what goes in Google Base might end up in Froogle or Google's main index. That's a pretty cheap and transparent carrot.

What Google Base lacks is the sense of community. I remember when Ciao and Dooyoo added the community features for the first time to their sites; it all took off then. I don't mean the advanced community features; just the ability to comment on other people's reviews.

I suspect we'll see more updates for Google Base. The URL http://base.google.co.uk is currently a blank page (rather than an error) so I suspect we'll see something there too. The original guidelines in Google Base insisted that any products added to the database must be for sale in the States and priced in dollars. That's just insane. That's anti-Google Base, in fact. We have Froogle US for that.

Click to Call
I think this is the most exciting PPC twist in a while (including the new contextual bidding rules). I pitty those SEO agencies who are contracted to long term deals with the minnows of pay-per-call technologies as they'll be fairly hamstrung now.

Google takes on the cost of the call. This could be interesting. This is also why, I guess, Google's been so interested in buying up dark fibres.