tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18266737.post2388234227507244932..comments2008-02-14T08:34:59.848ZComments on Andrew R H Girdwood: Skipping Twitter for PownceAndrew Girdwoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09402619137250257058noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18266737.post-41553722859290410062008-02-14T05:30:00.000Z2008-02-14T05:30:00.000Zpownce.com/tamarI just haven't logged onto it in a...pownce.com/tamar<BR/><BR/>I just haven't logged onto it in ages. For all I know, they deleted me for inactivity...Tamar Weinberghttp://www.techipedia.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18266737.post-4760299951069600382008-02-12T21:46:00.000Z2008-02-12T21:46:00.000ZDid you delete your account? I can't find you. May...Did you delete your account? I can't find you. Maybe you're there... but in stealth ninja mode! :)Andrew Girdwoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09402619137250257058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18266737.post-77100283939123754202008-02-12T14:12:00.000Z2008-02-12T14:12:00.000Z"I suppose I'll have to wait and see whether Pownc..."I suppose I'll have to wait and see whether Pownce wins anyone over from Twitter."<BR/><BR/>If my blog post review shows anything, it should have indicated that Pownce <I>did</I> win me over at first. Then I moved back to Twitter.<BR/><BR/>People went to Pownce. If you go back to a few months ago when it was in private beta, Pownce was bustling with activity. Not anymore. <BR/><BR/>Nobody as of late is going to Pownce. In fact, if you've been reading people's tweets, most have resigned to Twitter. And I don't blame them. :)<BR/><BR/>Personally, I use twhirl (twhirl.org) to manage Twitter. It's a lot nicer than the Twitter interface and is lightweight and stable. It works when Twitter does, and yes, Twitter does hiccup at times.Tamar Weinberghttp://www.techipedia.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18266737.post-82741400690329089932008-02-11T23:21:00.000Z2008-02-11T23:21:00.000ZOh. Hello. Fancy meeting you here.I agree. Pownce ...Oh. Hello. Fancy meeting you here.<BR/><BR/>I agree. Pownce seems to be very empty. Even people I've found on Pownce don't seem to have noticed my friends request which leads me to believe they don't write often.<BR/><BR/>If Pownce did help me update Facebook and LiveJournal then the lack of people there would be, slightly, mitigated - as it would act more than a central hub.<BR/><BR/>I suppose I'll have to wait and see whether Pownce wins anyone over from Twitter. I skipped bloglines and went straight to Google Reader and that worked out well for me!<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your input though. Your comments on Pownce were actually some of the evaluations I had in mind when I picked Pownce... so it's great to have your view here!Andrew Girdwoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09402619137250257058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18266737.post-79817852453312496012008-02-11T22:54:00.000Z2008-02-11T22:54:00.000ZI have to say that if you're looking for stability...I have to say that if you're looking for stability over community, then fine, go with Pownce. I've gotten a fair share of errors (even though I initially <A HREF="http://www.techipedia.com/2007/pownce-vs-twitter/" REL="nofollow">blogged that Pownce is better</A>). <BR/><BR/>It depends what you're aiming for. Why would you use Pownce if nobody else does? It's like a ghost town. I use Twitter because of the community. There's no reason to go to Pownce unless you want to take notes with yourself.Tamar Weinberghttp://www.techipedia.comnoreply@blogger.com